A senator in Chile is under fire for a foray into open-source lawmaking: he apparently cribbed a huge section of a Wikipedia entry for a legal brief, The Santiago Times reports:

The brief proposed prohibiting the import and development of nanotechnology in Chile. It included seven articles, six of which were lifted directly from the web site, and lacked quotation marks or citations. In addition, the brief was complete with the web site’s spelling and grammar errors, and underlined, hyperlinked words.

The senator, Alejandro Navarro, “maintains that his actions were not those of a plagiarist, and that he simply used the web site as a source,” La Tercera reported.

While the Senate decides whether to send his case to the ethics commission, Mr. Navarro, who is a Socialist, may want to familiarize himself with the encyclopedia’s copyright policy, which would have sanctioned his huge cut-and-paste job, provided he gave proper credit.

But there’s also the problem of Wikipedia’s inherently moving-target nature putting his efforts out of date. He published the brief in late December; since then, Wikipedia’s entry on nanotechnology has been changed more than 500 times.

To get around that problem, of course, the law itself could be wikified. Well, maybe that would not be such a good idea…